Virginia's Natural Bridge Navigation Blogroll
Search

Archives Credits

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Site design by
Sekimori

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
 
The Commons
Weekly Standard: Going Green?
Posted by Amy Ridenour  ·  18 June 2006  ·  Climate

Quick on the heels of its recommendation that conservatives support the Senate pro-amnesty immigration bill (for political rather than principled reasons, yet), the Weekly Standard is apparently laying the groundwork for a change in the conservative position on global warming.

From the June 12 issue, in an article by Contributing Editor Irwin M. Stelzer praising Treasury Secretary-designate Hank Paulson with all the enthusiasm usually reserved for people named Bush, comes this:

Then there is the environment, a policy area in which the Bush administration is in something of a time warp. No honest person can with certainty assert that global warming is a threat. But any responsible person can see that the evidence is sufficient to suggest that it might be, and that some action to contain emissions of greenhouse gases is an insurance policy worth having. Paulson is Wall Street's greenest titan, chairman of the Nature Conservancy, a bird-watcher, an advocate of a greenhouse gas emissions trading system for the United States and of mandatory curbs on emissions if voluntary action proves inadequate. At Goldman, he allocated $1 billion for investment in renewable energy and energy-saving projects. He is likely to make his voice heard in an administration that is said to be ready to move from its justifiable opposition to the Kyoto treaty to more positive proposals for emissions reduction.
No word from the Weekly Standard on the price tag of the "insurance policy worth having" (known as 'cap and trade' to those of us speaking plainly) as if 1) the cost wasn't billions, to be borne mostly by those who can least afford it, and 2) the "insurance policy" would actually lessen global warming IF (a big IF) the environmental left's position on global warming is accurate.

Will we soon see the Weekly Standard join the New Republic in name-calling skeptics of the notion that slowing the U.S. economy would have a notably beneficial impact on the world's weather?

(A longer version of this blog entry appears on the National Center Blog.)

Comments
  1. Amy, yes, the President is going Green and turning into an econut - after all, he's just locked away the coral reefs from Hawaii to Midway, and seems to be tired of all the bad (and undeniable, even with suppression in the agencies) news on the climate.

    It's high time he hired a guy like Paulson, whom you obviously think is another environmental radical like Whitman. The Republicans are way behind the curve on this and have alot of catching up to do. In the meanwhile, they deserve all the criticism they will no doubt get for twiddling their thumbs on this. What's it all about? Sheer greed (see John Baden's "Republican Reptiles", BTW?) on the part of the firms that benefit most from not dealing with the propoerty rights failure that climate change represents - and confirmation bias by some libertarians and conservatives who simply wanted the truth to go away.

    Posted by: TokyoTom at June 27, 2006 07:49 AM
Post a Comment












Remember personal info?