By Author:Iain MurrayJonathan H. Adler Amy Ridenour Tom Tanton Steve Hayward Randal O'Toole Michael DeAlessi Joel Schwartz IMGrant Andrew Morriss J. Bishop Grewell Chris Horner Marlo Lewis Carlo Stagnaro Pete Geddes John Downen John Baden Jane Shaw John La Plante Fred L. Smith Ken Green Ben Lieberman By Category:AgricultureAir Quality Biotechnology Brownfields CAFE Standards Climate DDT/Malaria Energy Energy Independence/National Security Environmental Alarmism Environmental Economics Environmental Risk European Union Extinction Federal Lands and Parks Federal Programs Federalism Forests International Media Oceans Pollution Population Poverty and Hunger Precautionary Principle Private Conservation Property Rights Recycling Sustainable Development Tragedy of the Commons Transportation Urban Planning and Sprawl Water Wildlife By Month:September 2007April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004
Powered by
Site design by |
Fagan on Climate and Ancient Societies
Posted by Jonathan H. Adler · 4 June 2006 · Climate
Archaeologist Brian Fagan, emeritus professor at the University of California at Santa Barbara, next spoke about the effects of past climate changes on ancient societies. In particular, he focused on the vulnerability of prior societies to environmental changes, and the lessons they offer for our own. Like Jared Diamond, he sought to suggest that the failures of prior societies were harbringers of our own current vulnerability. The beginning of human agriculture completely transformed human society, Fagan noted. This also increased human vulnerability to climate, Fagan suggested, because societies were now tied to the land. Ancient Egypt, for example, split apart at one point because a major drought dried up the Nile, triggering agricultural failure. The most successful regions were those where local leaders managed grain supplies. When Egypt was reunited, future Pharoahs were more active in stockpiling grain. The massive El Nino event of 600 A.D., combined with an earthquake, led to the collapse of ancient Peruvian society when agriculture failed. The lesson from these two examples, Fagan argued, is the need for government investment to prepare for inevitable disasters and downturns, as well as for less hubris about the durability of human society. (If I sound skeptical, it is because I am; I doubt Egyptian history really provides much support for central planning, and there is plenty of evidence against Diamond-esque “Collapse” theories.) Fagan also spoke of rural life in 14th Century Europe – a life governed by the change of the seasons. Yet beginning in 1315, parts of Europe experience nearly seven years of cold rains. Because most medieval peasants lived from harvest to harvest, the prolonged rains had a calamitous effect. Many people on the planet still live in conditions like those of Medieval Europe. The difference, Fagan suggests, is that their vulnerability has increased. Indeed, Fagan said, modern society remains vulnerable despite modern technology and wealth. “The only solution is long-term investment,” he says. Fagan’s conclusion is that history tells us human society has evolved from nimble hunter-gatherers to cumbersome elephants that are increasingly vulnerable to environmental change. Without political will and leadership, he said, we will remain “utterly vulnerable” to climate change. The devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina is an example of this, Fagan said (without noting that natural catastrophes cause far more death and devastation in less-developed, less-advanced, less-wealthy societies – suggesting that actual vulnerability is a function of wealth, technology and institutional arrangements ). Because of societal vulnerabilities and climate change, concluded Fagan, “the future of humankind may well be in trouble.” Perhaps, but I hardly think greater political control of resources is the answer. |