By Author:Iain MurrayJonathan H. Adler Amy Ridenour Tom Tanton Steve Hayward Randal O'Toole Michael DeAlessi Joel Schwartz IMGrant Andrew Morriss J. Bishop Grewell Chris Horner Marlo Lewis Carlo Stagnaro Pete Geddes John Downen John Baden Jane Shaw John La Plante Fred L. Smith Ken Green Ben Lieberman By Category:AgricultureAir Quality Biotechnology Brownfields CAFE Standards Climate DDT/Malaria Energy Energy Independence/National Security Environmental Alarmism Environmental Economics Environmental Risk European Union Extinction Federal Lands and Parks Federal Programs Federalism Forests International Media Oceans Pollution Population Poverty and Hunger Precautionary Principle Private Conservation Property Rights Recycling Sustainable Development Tragedy of the Commons Transportation Urban Planning and Sprawl Water Wildlife By Month:September 2007April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004
Powered by
Site design by |
Goodstein on Out of Gas
Posted by Jonathan H. Adler · 4 June 2006 · Energy
Caltech vice provost Dr. David Goodstein speaks on Out of Gas: The End of the Age of Oil. Goodstein sets out several "myths" of oil that he wants to show are false:
Goodstein, a physicist by training, is an advocate of "peak oil" theory, and presents the all-too familiar graphs of M. King Hubbert illustrating "Hubbert's Peak." While Hubbert's prediction of when U.S. onshore oil production would peak was controversial, he proved correct. He notes that today oil discoveries are declining while extraction is increasing, yet proven oil reserves are climbing. This is because proven reserves are a "political" number and not an actual measure of oil available in the ground. The peak in production is imminent, Goodstein says. We don't quite know what the impact of a peak will be, but the oil crises of 1972 and 1979 were "dry runs." When it happens it will "not be temporary," rather it will be permanent. As cautionary notes, Goodstein does point out that technological increases are the equivalent of new discoveries in terms of their effect on supply and that price increases do make more oil available. Proven reserves are a measure of what can be extracted economically, not what exists in the ground. Nonetheless, he believes the peak is approaching rapidly. This is a concern because so much modern civilization, particularly modern transportation, depends on the use of fossil fuels. Goodstein next takes on the economic argument that as oil prices increase, other fossil fuels will be substituted for oil. Alternative fuels, such as natural gas, or only a temporary solution, Goodstein argues. He also discounts the potential for shale oil or methane hydrate to make a difference. Coal can be liquefied to substitute for oil, but it is intolerably dirty (containing mercury, arsenic, and sulfur). Moreover, if coal production were to replace oil, coal use would have to increase by a factor of five, requiring the mining of coal on an intolerable scale and causing a rapid depletion of coal reserves. Indeed, Goodstein predicts that the Hubbert's Peal for coal would occur within a century. Goodstein argues that the peak of oil will occur at some point soon – perhaps as soon as ten to twenty years. Making a shift to alternatives exceedingly important. Such a transition, such as to nuclear and solar power, will be difficult and costly, however, and will take many years. In closing, Goodstein offers a prediction: "Civilization as we know it will come to an end sometime in this century, when the fuel runs out." Wheras most scientists hope their predictions are proven true, because it shows how smart they are, Goodstein hopes his predictions is wrong.
|