By Author:Iain MurrayJonathan H. Adler Amy Ridenour Tom Tanton Steve Hayward Randal O'Toole Michael DeAlessi Joel Schwartz IMGrant Andrew Morriss J. Bishop Grewell Chris Horner Marlo Lewis Carlo Stagnaro Pete Geddes John Downen John Baden Jane Shaw John La Plante Fred L. Smith Ken Green Ben Lieberman By Category:AgricultureAir Quality Biotechnology Brownfields CAFE Standards Climate DDT/Malaria Energy Energy Independence/National Security Environmental Alarmism Environmental Economics Environmental Risk European Union Extinction Federal Lands and Parks Federal Programs Federalism Forests International Media Oceans Pollution Population Poverty and Hunger Precautionary Principle Private Conservation Property Rights Recycling Sustainable Development Tragedy of the Commons Transportation Urban Planning and Sprawl Water Wildlife By Month:September 2007April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004
Powered by
Site design by |
Deconstructing Climate Change
Posted by Steve Hayward · 18 February 2006 ·
I'm really lame at using the Moveable Type template (is it because I use a Mac??), so I am derelict in my duty to this fine page, but I thought it worth a try to link to my sprawling Weekly Standard article just out on climate change: here (Hopefully this link will get you past the subscription portal.) Meanwhile, I can't help but add a comment about Bishop's post about Paul Ehrlich below. I've just had my second extended encounter with Ehrlich, culminating in a 30 block walk together in New York back to our hotel after a conference dinner, and while the fundamental differences in our outlook remain, he is personally pleasant and wishes to engage the issues in a serious way with open give and take. As Bishop notes, he has come around a little on population, and refers to some of his earlier work as his "polemical phase." I can say that I have enjoyed talking and debating with him a whole lot more than anyone from the DC offices of the NRDC, LCV, etc.
|