Virginia's Natural Bridge Navigation Blogroll
Search

Archives Credits

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Site design by
Sekimori

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
 
The Commons
The current climate debate
Posted by Kendra Okonski  ·   4 November 2005  ·  Climate

This week, various energy and environment ministers met in London as part of the G8 effort to gather consensus on climate policy.

The consensus which seems to be evolving is that 1) some EU countries, including the UK, are failing to meet their existing targets under Kyoto and 2) poor countries do not want to negotiate to reduce binding emissions targets for themselves after 2012, when the Kyoto Protocol ends. Negotiations for post-2012 were due to take place at COP-11 of the Framework Convention on Climate Change next month in Montreal.

It is worth remembering that Article 3.3 of the Framework Convention obliges its signatories (including the USA) to undertake "cost-effective" policies and measures to cope with climate change. Emissions controls are probably the least cost-effective way to address climate change.

I have an article in the Bangkok Post today which argues that it is climate, not climate change, which poses the most risk to the world's poorest people, and that economic development is the most effective way to reduce their vulnerability to climate.

Comments
  1. Excellent, Excellent.

    "This backward system creates huge inefficiencies, theft and waste".

    You got that right. I spent three days in Jodhpur, India a city of one million people. One evening there was a wedding in the city, and the wedding area was decorated with strings of electric lights. Once they turned on those lights, all the lights in Jodhpur went dim. Unbelievable for a city of a million.

    I was surprised at the thick brown smoke that hangs over the city. This smoke is from cow dung fires used for cooking and heating as they certainly cannot use electricity.

    Forget the global warming shit, lets deal with the pollution caused by burning of shit in third world countries.

    Posted by: Jake at November 4, 2005 02:40 PM
  2. Is there something wrong with the link to The Bangkok Post?

    Posted by: garth at November 6, 2005 08:05 PM