By Author:Iain MurrayJonathan H. Adler Amy Ridenour Tom Tanton Steve Hayward Randal O'Toole Michael DeAlessi Joel Schwartz IMGrant Andrew Morriss J. Bishop Grewell Chris Horner Marlo Lewis Carlo Stagnaro Pete Geddes John Downen John Baden Jane Shaw John La Plante Fred L. Smith Ken Green Ben Lieberman By Category:AgricultureAir Quality Biotechnology Brownfields CAFE Standards Climate DDT/Malaria Energy Energy Independence/National Security Environmental Alarmism Environmental Economics Environmental Risk European Union Extinction Federal Lands and Parks Federal Programs Federalism Forests International Media Oceans Pollution Population Poverty and Hunger Precautionary Principle Private Conservation Property Rights Recycling Sustainable Development Tragedy of the Commons Transportation Urban Planning and Sprawl Water Wildlife By Month:September 2007April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004
Powered by
Site design by |
Regulatory Oversight of Country Music
Posted by Andrew Morriss · 27 August 2005 ·
Paul Summers, the state AG in Tennessee seems to have time on his hands - he's after country singer Gretchen Wilson for her new song "Skoal Ring". Summers says that Wilson's removal of a can of Skoal from her pants pocket during performances of the song may violate the 1998 settlement between the states and tobacco companies. See the account here. Without having seen the video of Wilson's performance or recently read the settlment (although I read it several years ago), I find this claim an implausible regulatory overreach - Ms. Wilson is not a party to the agreement and if she wants to wave Skoal cans at her concerts, that's just too bad for Mr. Summers. The larger problem (and its relevance to The Commons) is that state AGs are becoming increasingly problemmatic regulators, threatening litigation to force through regulatory changes they could not otherwise obtain. (For an account of this at the federal level, you can read an early version of my paper, coauthored with Bruce Yandle and Andrew Dorchak on Choosing How to Regulate here. The final version appeared in the Harvard Environmental Law Review.) |