By Author:Iain MurrayJonathan H. Adler Amy Ridenour Tom Tanton Steve Hayward Randal O'Toole Michael DeAlessi Joel Schwartz IMGrant Andrew Morriss J. Bishop Grewell Chris Horner Marlo Lewis Carlo Stagnaro Pete Geddes John Downen John Baden Jane Shaw John La Plante Fred L. Smith Ken Green Ben Lieberman By Category:AgricultureAir Quality Biotechnology Brownfields CAFE Standards Climate DDT/Malaria Energy Energy Independence/National Security Environmental Alarmism Environmental Economics Environmental Risk European Union Extinction Federal Lands and Parks Federal Programs Federalism Forests International Media Oceans Pollution Population Poverty and Hunger Precautionary Principle Private Conservation Property Rights Recycling Sustainable Development Tragedy of the Commons Transportation Urban Planning and Sprawl Water Wildlife By Month:September 2007April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004
Powered by
Site design by |
Oh, grow up
Posted by Tom Tanton · 8 August 2005 · Energy
In what appears to be intentional amnesia, the California Legislature and Governor Schwarzenegger appear committed to mandating yet another round of subsidies for and required use of solar energy. The legislation, SB 1, appears unstoppable, and in one supportive yet typical editorial is described here. What seems to always be forgotten or miscast are a) renewables already receive HIGHER levels of subsidies compared to traditional energy sources, when measured on an output basis b) solar energy has benefited from over thirty years of similar programs yet can never quite grow up—every mandate and subsidy program has said it would wean solar from the need for government support -- in California alone support has totaled several billions of dollars from taxpayers and ratepayers and c) paying for almost half of the cost of systems using taxpayer dollars has not and cannot drive the price down in a mandatory-use program. Of course the fact that the equipment for such systems is imported from foreign countries is always forgotten as well. |