By Author:Iain MurrayJonathan H. Adler Amy Ridenour Tom Tanton Steve Hayward Randal O'Toole Michael DeAlessi Joel Schwartz IMGrant Andrew Morriss J. Bishop Grewell Chris Horner Marlo Lewis Carlo Stagnaro Pete Geddes John Downen John Baden Jane Shaw John La Plante Fred L. Smith Ken Green Ben Lieberman By Category:AgricultureAir Quality Biotechnology Brownfields CAFE Standards Climate DDT/Malaria Energy Energy Independence/National Security Environmental Alarmism Environmental Economics Environmental Risk European Union Extinction Federal Lands and Parks Federal Programs Federalism Forests International Media Oceans Pollution Population Poverty and Hunger Precautionary Principle Private Conservation Property Rights Recycling Sustainable Development Tragedy of the Commons Transportation Urban Planning and Sprawl Water Wildlife By Month:September 2007April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004
Powered by
Site design by |
Alien Tort Claim Act Decision
Posted by J. Bishop Grewell · 8 July 2005 · International
Today, in Aldana v. Del Monte Fresh, the 11th Circuit rejected an Alien Tort Claim cause of action for failing to qualify for a jurisdictional grant, because the claim wasn't violative of international customary law. The case involved a union fight in Guatemala between laborers and a plantation run for Del Monte Fresh, which is incorporated in Delaware and has its principle place of business in Florida. The laborers asserted that they were threatened and pushed around with guns by a private security force used by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Del Monte. In its decision, the court discussed the potential for incorporation of evolving norms of international customary law into U.S. law. While the court didn't do much more than discuss the recent Supreme Court decision of Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain in reaching its opinion, the discussion made it clear that the lower courts feel a tension created by the U.S. Supreme Court in just how much international law should be taken into consideration by U.S. courts. For an earlier post on Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain and its relevance in the environmental context, see here. |