Virginia's Natural Bridge Navigation Blogroll
Search

Archives Credits

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Site design by
Sekimori

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
 
The Commons
Tilting at Windmills
Posted by Jonathan H. Adler  ·  17 February 2005  ·  Energy

Environmental sage Bill McKibben is upset that more environmentalists don't really support wind power. Sure, national environmental groups talk about the importance of wind as an alternative energy source, but green groups nonetheless oppose many of the wind farm proposals that are actually put on the table, such as the plan to put wind turbines off the coast of Cape Cod.

In part, wind power has failed to take hold

because environmentalists, particularly in the crowded East, haven't come to terms with this technology. In fights in Cape Cod, the mountains of Vermont, and the ridgelines of Maryland, they've divided into bitter factions over almost every turbine proposal. On one side, national environmental groups like Greenpeace have backed many installations, arguing that the dangers of global warming far outweigh any local effects. On the other side, neighbors of proposed wind farms have joined with local chapters of big conservation groups to fight the Statue-of-Liberty-size windmills on environmental grounds, chiefly arguing that they'll destroy the scenic beauty of their areas.
Such environmental impacts are real, McKibben argues, but must be compared with the environmental impacts of the alternatives. Or, as GristMill's Dave Roberts puts it:
If environmentalists take global warming seriously, and expect others to take it seriously, maybe they shouldn't become bitchy provincialists the minute you want to build a wind turbine that impedes the scenic view off the back porches of their vacation homes.
This just goes to show that all energy sources have environmental impacts, and there is no free lunch.

McKibben also attributes the failure of wind power to the policies of the Bush Administration. Here is where McKibben's analysis is much less clear. He cannot simultaneouly maintain (as he does) that wind power is "cost-competitive with fossil fuels," and yet is faltering, in part, due "scant government support for renewable energy." If wind power were truly cost-competitive -- and I am skeptical that it is -- then it does not need government support. McKibben can't have it both ways.

Speaking of alternative energy sources, Lynne Keisling has some interesting observations on alternative energy sources, including wave power, here.

Comments
  1. If wind power were truly cost-competitive -- and I am skeptical that it is -- then it does not need government support.

    You are assuming that government does not, in a thousand ways large and small, support more traditional energy sources like oil, coal, and nuclear.

    Environmentalists would like nothing more than a geniunely level playing field for alternative energies to compete on. But there is no such field, so for now the best we can do is argue for some public support.

    Posted by: Dave Roberts at February 17, 2005 03:42 PM
  2. Why does Dave Roberts say "the best [environmentalists] can do is argue for some public support"? How about arguing against those alleged subsidies for nuclear, coal, oil, etc.? If you really want a "level playing field", the better outcome is making it level by removing distortions, not trying to pile more subsidies on top.

    Posted by: Andrew Morriss at February 21, 2005 07:10 AM
  3. Those supporters of renewable technologies who claim to want a level playing filed should keep in mind that renewables receive subsidies that are about 25 times (25 times...not 25%) larger than those for other energy sources, when measured on how much energy that actually provide. That's based on Energy Information Admin. numbers

    Posted by: Tom Tanton at February 21, 2005 09:28 AM
  4. How do any subsidies for coal (some are obscure - coal can be moved by barge because the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers keeps rivers navigable) balance the costs (and risks) imposed by regulatory pressure against strip mining?

    Posted by: triticale at February 21, 2005 01:54 PM