By Author:Iain MurrayJonathan H. Adler Amy Ridenour Tom Tanton Steve Hayward Randal O'Toole Michael DeAlessi Joel Schwartz IMGrant Andrew Morriss J. Bishop Grewell Chris Horner Marlo Lewis Carlo Stagnaro Pete Geddes John Downen John Baden Jane Shaw John La Plante Fred L. Smith Ken Green Ben Lieberman By Category:AgricultureAir Quality Biotechnology Brownfields CAFE Standards Climate DDT/Malaria Energy Energy Independence/National Security Environmental Alarmism Environmental Economics Environmental Risk European Union Extinction Federal Lands and Parks Federal Programs Federalism Forests International Media Oceans Pollution Population Poverty and Hunger Precautionary Principle Private Conservation Property Rights Recycling Sustainable Development Tragedy of the Commons Transportation Urban Planning and Sprawl Water Wildlife By Month:September 2007April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004
Powered by
Site design by |
Tony Blair and the G8
Posted by Kendra Okonski · 30 December 2004 · International
Britain's own Tony Blair writes that 2005 will be 'A year of challenges' in the 31 December edition of The Economist, an article about Britain's upcoming leadership of the G8. The story features a nice picture of the Prime Minister in front of subsistence farmers in Africa. Indeed, Blair's two key causes for the G8 will be Africa and climate change. Without action to control emissions into the earth's climate, he says that it is Africa which will suffer most. Some analysts, such as Copenhagen Consensus architect Bjorn Lomborg, have argued that the world must prioritize its scarce resources to help people of today - not people in 100 years - and the causes of Africa's problems are much more fundamental than the earth's climate. Blair directly criticizes this idea - saying that it is flawed because "Without a stable climate, addressing other environmental threats will be impossible, ensuring a future of more degraded water and land". (Perhaps this is because Blair's own cabinet advisors and colleagues in 'humanitarian' British NGOs fail to understand the underlying causes of degraded water and land.) Blair also provides a rather flaky justification -- "I have never believed that simple discounting can be an adequate tool for potentially catastrophic outcomes 50 or more years ahead" -- for rejecting Lomborg's rationale that policies which have costs today, and in the case of Kyoto, potentially few benefits in 50 or 100 years, are not a good investment for humanity. |