By Author:Iain MurrayJonathan H. Adler Amy Ridenour Tom Tanton Steve Hayward Randal O'Toole Michael DeAlessi Joel Schwartz IMGrant Andrew Morriss J. Bishop Grewell Chris Horner Marlo Lewis Carlo Stagnaro Pete Geddes John Downen John Baden Jane Shaw John La Plante Fred L. Smith Ken Green Ben Lieberman By Category:AgricultureAir Quality Biotechnology Brownfields CAFE Standards Climate DDT/Malaria Energy Energy Independence/National Security Environmental Alarmism Environmental Economics Environmental Risk European Union Extinction Federal Lands and Parks Federal Programs Federalism Forests International Media Oceans Pollution Population Poverty and Hunger Precautionary Principle Private Conservation Property Rights Recycling Sustainable Development Tragedy of the Commons Transportation Urban Planning and Sprawl Water Wildlife By Month:September 2007April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004
Powered by
Site design by |
Progress, or anti-progress, at COP10?
Posted by Kendra Okonski · 14 December 2004 · Climate
As COP-10 in Buenos Aires draws to a close with a ministerial meeting from 15-17 December, environmental activists are pressuring developing countries such as India, Brazil and China to agree to emissions controls - whether under Kyoto, or some other mechanism altogether. On Monday, the Union of Concerned Scientists went as far as saying that "If India, China and Brazil replicate our pattern of fossil-intensive development, the game is over" (see news story) The Sustainable Development Network issued a press release today to suggest that "Imposing Kyoto-style emissions restrictions on poor countries would be 'immoral". Inevitably there will be a battle in the final days of COP-10 over the issue -- with offers of carrots in the form of foreign aid and technology transfers to entice bureaucrats from poor countries to sign up. Not only will Kyoto-style emissions controls do nothing to help poor countries to deal with the potential problems of climate change, it will slow development and thereby perpetuate disease, misery and suffering that already exist today. For COP10, the SDN released a blueprint for thinking about sustainable development and climate change, to encourage some coherent thinking on the subject. |