By Author:Iain MurrayJonathan H. Adler Amy Ridenour Tom Tanton Steve Hayward Randal O'Toole Michael DeAlessi Joel Schwartz IMGrant Andrew Morriss J. Bishop Grewell Chris Horner Marlo Lewis Carlo Stagnaro Pete Geddes John Downen John Baden Jane Shaw John La Plante Fred L. Smith Ken Green Ben Lieberman By Category:AgricultureAir Quality Biotechnology Brownfields CAFE Standards Climate DDT/Malaria Energy Energy Independence/National Security Environmental Alarmism Environmental Economics Environmental Risk European Union Extinction Federal Lands and Parks Federal Programs Federalism Forests International Media Oceans Pollution Population Poverty and Hunger Precautionary Principle Private Conservation Property Rights Recycling Sustainable Development Tragedy of the Commons Transportation Urban Planning and Sprawl Water Wildlife By Month:September 2007April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004
Powered by
Site design by |
Hot Air in Buenos Aires
Posted by Iain Murray · 14 December 2004 · Climate
The last Conference of the Parties to the Kyoto protocol before the agreement comes into effect is currently taking place in Buenos Aires. COP-10 so far seems to be no different from the previous COPs, consisting mainly of bleatings from Europe about America not facing up to its responsibilities, despite Europe being way off target to meet its obligations under Kyoto, developing world governments demanding vast hand-outs from developed nations, China, India and Brazil refusing point-blank to consider cutting back their greenhouse gas emissions in any way and the whole thing being an exercise in futility anyway as Kyoto will do virtually nothing to reduce global temperature even if you believe the alarmist case for global warming. In any event, here are some of the more interesting reports so far: The background to the meeting from Reason science writer Ron Bailey. Bjorn Lomborg puts the problem in context. China sets out its uncompromising stance. COP-10 compared to popular sitcom. Commentary on the Arctic controversy. CEI fellow Chris Horner sums up: "The denominator among these proposals remains that developed countries should develop much more slowly if at all, and the others should only do so via the elites' preferred methods." We'll try to keep the Commons updated with more news from the BA boondoggle as it progresses (if that word is at all applicable). |