By Author:Iain MurrayJonathan H. Adler Amy Ridenour Tom Tanton Steve Hayward Randal O'Toole Michael DeAlessi Joel Schwartz IMGrant Andrew Morriss J. Bishop Grewell Chris Horner Marlo Lewis Carlo Stagnaro Pete Geddes John Downen John Baden Jane Shaw John La Plante Fred L. Smith Ken Green Ben Lieberman By Category:AgricultureAir Quality Biotechnology Brownfields CAFE Standards Climate DDT/Malaria Energy Energy Independence/National Security Environmental Alarmism Environmental Economics Environmental Risk European Union Extinction Federal Lands and Parks Federal Programs Federalism Forests International Media Oceans Pollution Population Poverty and Hunger Precautionary Principle Private Conservation Property Rights Recycling Sustainable Development Tragedy of the Commons Transportation Urban Planning and Sprawl Water Wildlife By Month:September 2007April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004
Powered by
Site design by |
From Brownfields to Putting Greens
Posted by Jonathan H. Adler · 16 September 2004 · Brownfields
Where is there to build a new golf course in heavily urbanized areas, like northern New Jersey? How about a former waste site? Tuesday’s Wall Street Journal featured a story on the Liberty National Golf Course, a $129 million project underway to create a premier golf course on a fomer waste site along the New York Harbor. While more expensive than most, this project is hardly unique. Over the past 40 years, the WSJ reports, over 70 golf courses have been built on former waste sites nationwide. Golf courses are well suited for former waste sites because, unlike office buildings or other structures, they don’t place much weight on the ground, which can essentially squeeze contaminants out of the soil – contaminants that would otherwise harmlessly stay put. This is simply another good example of why the sort of remediation necessary at a given waste site is very much a factor of intended future uses – and any policy that fails to take this into account wastes money, increases environmental risks, or both. |