Virginia's Natural Bridge Navigation Blogroll
Search

Archives Credits

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Site design by
Sekimori

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
 
The Commons
The Absurdity of Giving Federal Green to Greens
Posted by Max Borders  ·  12 August 2004  ·  

No matter what you think about the Bush administration and its environmental policies, this study by David Healy at CRC should be disconcerting - maybe even a little perplexing.

Here's the long and short of it: the federal gov't takes tax dollars from the US taxpayer, and then gives it to environmental organizations as part of federal subsidy programs meant to aid in Green efforts. The figureheads of those self-same organizations use the subsidies to propagate anti-Administration rhetoric – especially with respect to the Administration’s environmental policies (read: EPA and Interior). Therefore, taxpayers via the Administration are being forced to fund Green propaganda. This is a vicious, vicious circle for all parties involved (except, of course, environmental groups who are content in their role as rent-seekers).

The moral? The federal government should get out of the business of subsidizing NGOs, much like it should get out of the business of subsidizing NPR and PBS.

Comments
  1. Newt Gingrich tried to get a law passed banning all non-profits who received funding from the government from lobbying Congress. He realized that many obsolete and expensive programs are kept in place only by the lobbying of non-profit special interest groups.

    The special interest groups lobby was too powerful and Newt had to give up.

    Posted by: Jake at August 12, 2004 08:52 PM
  2. I notice that amounts are given but no examples, this should make us suspicious. There is a difference between c-3 and c-4 and PAC dollars. If the money comes from different pots, it may well not be replaceable from a donor that is willing to give to one but not the other.

    I'm treasurer of a couple of PACs The money I raise is from folks who want a political effect from their money. They wouldn't give to a c-4 or c-3 cause with that money; they would go to another PAC.

    I would like to have a comprehensive list of what the funds granted were for; without that we are unable to make an informed decision.

    Posted by: alan aronson at August 13, 2004 03:00 AM