By Author:Iain MurrayJonathan H. Adler Amy Ridenour Tom Tanton Steve Hayward Randal O'Toole Michael DeAlessi Joel Schwartz IMGrant Andrew Morriss J. Bishop Grewell Chris Horner Marlo Lewis Carlo Stagnaro Pete Geddes John Downen John Baden Jane Shaw John La Plante Fred L. Smith Ken Green Ben Lieberman By Category:AgricultureAir Quality Biotechnology Brownfields CAFE Standards Climate DDT/Malaria Energy Energy Independence/National Security Environmental Alarmism Environmental Economics Environmental Risk European Union Extinction Federal Lands and Parks Federal Programs Federalism Forests International Media Oceans Pollution Population Poverty and Hunger Precautionary Principle Private Conservation Property Rights Recycling Sustainable Development Tragedy of the Commons Transportation Urban Planning and Sprawl Water Wildlife By Month:September 2007April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004
Powered by
Site design by |
Rail Transit Disasters
Posted by Randal O'Toole · 26 July 2004 ·
Rail transit will be on the ballot this November in Denver, Austin, and possibly other cities. While local proponents ballyhoo the benefits, rail projects in other cities have recently experienced serious problems that should help opponents convince voters to turn down new taxes for rails. Minneapolis opened its Hiawatha light-rail line last month. Traffic on Hiawatha Avenue paralleling the line immediately became far more congested. The reason? Traffic engineers gave the light rail priority at all traffic signals. People who once could drive from one end of Hiawatha to another without stoppng now at synchronized traffic lights must now stop several times along the route, adding 10 to 15 minutes to typical journeys. Houston opened a 7.5-mile light-rail line in its downtown on January 1. It has so far caused more than 50 collisions with autos or pedestrians (including a few during testing before January 1). While the transit agency blames bad auto drivers, the accident rate is twenty times the national average for light-rail lines. Last fall, the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) opened a new line to the San Francisco Airport. Ridership is only half of projected levels, and San Mateo Transit, which agreed to fund the operating costs, is now in dire financial straights. It will probably have to cut service on popular bus routes to pay for a poorly utilized rail line. A few years ago, San Jose voters agreed to raise sales taxes to build light-rail lines and a BART line. The transit agency sold bonds and started construction. When the recent recession hit, sales tax revenues plummeted, and to avoid defaulting on the bonds the agency cut transit service. It has lost more than a third of its passengers in the last three years and a grand jury report has accused the transit agency of financial mismanagement. This and the BART airport experience have convinced even the Sierra Club to oppose extending BART to San Jose. The push for rail transit comes from construction companies that seek to soak the taxpayers building it, downtown property owners who hope to enhance the value of their properties, anti-auto environmentalists who view congestion with schadenfreude, and collectivists who think we would be better off in collective transit than private autos. None of these reasons are very appealing so they cloak their goals behind specious claims that rails will reduce traffic congestion and air pollution, something that rail transit has never done.
|