Virginia's Natural Bridge Navigation Blogroll
Search

Archives Credits

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Site design by
Sekimori

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
 
The Commons
Rail Transit Disasters
Posted by Randal O'Toole  ·  26 July 2004  ·  

Rail transit will be on the ballot this November in Denver, Austin, and possibly other cities. While local proponents ballyhoo the benefits, rail projects in other cities have recently experienced serious problems that should help opponents convince voters to turn down new taxes for rails.

Minneapolis opened its Hiawatha light-rail line last month. Traffic on Hiawatha Avenue paralleling the line immediately became far more congested. The reason? Traffic engineers gave the light rail priority at all traffic signals. People who once could drive from one end of Hiawatha to another without stoppng now at synchronized traffic lights must now stop several times along the route, adding 10 to 15 minutes to typical journeys.

Houston opened a 7.5-mile light-rail line in its downtown on January 1. It has so far caused more than 50 collisions with autos or pedestrians (including a few during testing before January 1). While the transit agency blames bad auto drivers, the accident rate is twenty times the national average for light-rail lines.

Last fall, the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) opened a new line to the San Francisco Airport. Ridership is only half of projected levels, and San Mateo Transit, which agreed to fund the operating costs, is now in dire financial straights. It will probably have to cut service on popular bus routes to pay for a poorly utilized rail line.

A few years ago, San Jose voters agreed to raise sales taxes to build light-rail lines and a BART line. The transit agency sold bonds and started construction. When the recent recession hit, sales tax revenues plummeted, and to avoid defaulting on the bonds the agency cut transit service. It has lost more than a third of its passengers in the last three years and a grand jury report has accused the transit agency of financial mismanagement. This and the BART airport experience have convinced even the Sierra Club to oppose extending BART to San Jose.

The push for rail transit comes from construction companies that seek to soak the taxpayers building it, downtown property owners who hope to enhance the value of their properties, anti-auto environmentalists who view congestion with schadenfreude, and collectivists who think we would be better off in collective transit than private autos. None of these reasons are very appealing so they cloak their goals behind specious claims that rails will reduce traffic congestion and air pollution, something that rail transit has never done.

Comments
  1. I'm a resident of the Houston area, and so I have to listen to these light-rail accident horror stories all the time. Our mass transit company, METRO, has finally realized that light rail causes too many problems on downtown streets. So far the only solution METRO can think of is to start building a subway system. Many people in the Houston area, upon hearing this idea, pause for a moment, then say something along the lines of "but we're at sea level." Local talk show host Chris Baker dubbed it the "METRO submarine."

    Needless to say, many of us have lost faith in METRO. We still don't know why they've ignored the monorail option for so long wich would at least be better than light rail or a subway that would have to be constantly pumped free of water.

    Meanwhile, there has been no noticeable reduction in congestion.

    Posted by: Dubya at July 26, 2004 10:36 PM
  2. Mr. O'Toole,

    I've had a site named The Commons since March/April. I've been duly registered with Site Meter, Technorati, The Truth Laid Bare, and so forth. I had a contributor send me a link to this spot, of which I was unawares. I'm disappointed that you guys put up your site without checking out my name. Very disappointed.

    Please drop me a note or something.

    Paul Fordiani
    paulie@paulieworld.com
    www.paulieworld.com/blog
    The Commons

    Posted by: Paul Fordiani at July 27, 2004 04:21 AM
  3. If you cared so much for the name why did you not bother to buy the domain? Ridiculous.

    Posted by: Sekimori at July 29, 2004 03:33 PM
  4. Greetings!

    A few minor corrections: The Sierra Club link says BART has decided to abandon the San Bruno to Millbrea leg. Now that may mean they plan to in the future with some new schedule yet to be announced. But as of today, the Richmond to Millbrea service goes directly from San Bruno to Millbrea during commute hours, bypassing SFO. Not abandoned yet.

    VTA has opened the Capital Avenue extension to service. The Vasona line is the only remaining light rail line under construction. The Capital Avenue extension replaced a bus line that provided 30 minute headway, and ended around 10 PM at night. Light rail stations replace are 1 for 3; one station replaces 3 bus stops except for the last 2 stations, where they replace 4 bus stops. The last station is called Alum Rock which is a little deceiving, since Alum Rock riders will find themselves crossing Alum Rock at 30 mph and go another 4/10 of a mile before they pull in to the station, which is 2 more streets down Capital Ave.

    In order to help provide ridership on the line, VTA butchered the existing bus service throughout East San Jose. In some cases riders have to pay 2 fares, where they once paid one. Bus lines were shortened, diverted, or eliminated, so that in a few months another ploy we have seen occur over and over in this country, will take place. "Surprise, surprise! Ridership is ahead of expectations...."

    Also, I was surprised to learn in the Grand Jury Report that VTA fares are $1.75. Since an adult fare today is $1.50, this means another fare increase in 2005, I guess. Already planned.

    When the current recession hit, VTA had not physically started any BART construction. They did, however, slow ongoing construction on the new light rail lines.

    Last but not least, the San Jose to BART line will replace one bus line, the Express 180. This goes from downtown San Jose to Fremont BART, where the BART extension would start. After 7:30 PM, service is hourly, with roughly half full loads. And of course, service ends at midnight sharp, because that is when BART's last train leaves. To be sure, there are a handful of commute hour feeder bus lines that also serve Fremont BART. But they are a low number. So the basic service should be compared to the 180 Express line, and that line surely is not overcrowded.

    I cannot understand how the BART extension will help traffic on I-880. These cars do not end up on San Jose's east side. I do not see huge streams of cars coming off I-880 and going down into the Berryessa or downtown San Jose area.

    Posted by: Norm at August 2, 2004 02:45 PM